2,600+ GW
of clean power projects in US interconnection queues
20%
of US electricity from nuclear, the largest clean baseload source
projected grid storage capacity growth by 2030
$10T+
energy transition investment by 2050 (BloombergNEF)
Today

Latest news

All news →
Energy-Storage.News, July 21, 2026 us-supplypermitting

Spearmint clears Minnesota permit for second 600 MWh MISO project

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission granted Spearmint Energy a site permit for the 150 MW / 600 MWh Midwater project in Freeborn County, the developer's second Minnesota standalone storage approval. Installed capex is roughly $457 million, using Tesla Megapack 2XL LFP modules, with construction targeted for Q1 2027 and commercial operation by year-end 2027.

Utility Dive, July 7, 2026 us-supplythesis-confirm

Massachusetts files 4.5 GWh of Section 83E storage on former oil and coal sites

The Electric Distribution Companies filed three long-term storage contracts with the Massachusetts DPU under Section 83E Round I: Jupiter Power's 700 MW / 2,800 MWh Trimount at a former Everett oil terminal, Flatiron Energy's 250 MW / 1,000 MWh Energizar in Chelsea, and Flatiron's 168 MW / 672 MWh Salt Cod on the Montaup Power Plant site in Somerset. Combined, 1,068 MW / 4,472 MWh at four-hour duration, all on brownfields with utility offtake, all targeted at the state's 5 GW by 2030 goal.

Fluence Energy press release, July 13, 2026 us-supplyira

Fluence lands 800 MWh Rexford 2 EPC; the solar-plus-storage default hardens in California

Fluence Energy signed on July 13 to provide its Smartstack system and turnkey EPC for Avantus's Rexford 2 project in Tulare County, California: 200 MW solar paired with a 200 MW / 800 MWh, four-hour battery under a 20-year PPA with Clean Power Alliance. Cells, modules, enclosures, and thermal management ship from US plants in Utah, South Carolina, and Texas, keeping the stack inside the domestic-content perimeter.

Analysis

Recent long-form

All analysis →
High-voltage transmission lines running across an open landscape at dusk, standing in for the Oncor and CenterPoint transmission networks that will file Batch Zero utility eligibility packages with ERCOT on Friday July 24, 2026.
ercotpuct

One day to the ERCOT Batch Zero utility filings, and the analytical work the tape requires is already scoped: three sub-reads on Oncor, one corridor test, one ride-through count

The ERCOT Batch Zero utility eligibility filings land tomorrow, Friday July 24, and the analytical anchor has narrowed from the state-wide aggregate to the Oncor sub-corridor breakdown, the Oncor stability data coverage ratio, and the Oncor ride-through overlay determinations. Those three inputs are the operative read on the size and shape of the pool that carries into the April 2027 Phase 1 study allocation. The Friday tape sequence itself matters. Utility filings will not land simultaneously. The order and timing of the disclosures will determine which sub-read the market prices first, and the effective price on Batch Zero eligibility will re-form across Friday afternoon and into Monday's open.

High-voltage transmission lines and lattice towers running across an open landscape at dusk, standing in for the Oncor transmission and distribution network that will file the largest single share of Batch Zero utility eligibility packages with ERCOT on Friday July 24, 2026.
ercotpuct

Two days to the ERCOT Batch Zero utility filings, and the analytical anchor on the July 24 tape is not the aggregate eligibility ratio, it is the Oncor concentration inside the eligible pool

The ERCOT Batch Zero utility eligibility filings land Friday July 24 across every transmission and distribution utility in the state with projects in the developer pool. Aggregate eligibility ratio is the headline read, but the substantive constraint the July 24 tape will disclose is inside one utility footprint. Oncor carries roughly half of the ERCOT large-load application volume by megawatts, and the Oncor eligibility filing will therefore set the effective ceiling on the April 2027 Phase 1 allocation regardless of what CenterPoint, AEP Texas, TNMP, and the municipal utilities file. The T-2 read is the Oncor sub-corridor breakdown, the Oncor stability study coverage, and the Oncor treatment of any project that flags the ride-through overlay as marginal. Those three inputs, not the state-wide aggregate, are the analytical spine of Friday's tape.

Transmission tower silhouette against evening sky, standing in for the Texas transmission and distribution utility eligibility filings due to ERCOT on July 24, 2026 under the Public Utility Commission of Texas Batch Zero large-load framework.
ercotpuct

The ERCOT Batch Zero utility-side eligibility deadline lands Friday, and the transmission and distribution utility filings will set the effective ceiling on how much of the July 10 developer pool actually reaches the April 2027 allocation

The Public Utility Commission of Texas approved the Batch Zero large-load interconnection framework on June 18. Developer submissions closed July 10. On Friday July 24, transmission and distribution utilities must file complete eligibility packages with ERCOT for every project in the pool, or that project drops out of Batch Zero and waits for the next batch. The utility filings are procedural, but the substantive read from the July 24 tape will be how far the TDU-side headroom sits below the developer-side pipeline. That gap sets the ceiling on the megawatts that can clear into the April 9, 2027 Phase 1 study allocation, and it is the first measurable data point on whether Batch Zero can absorb the ERCOT large-load queue at the pace regulators intended.

Frequently asked

Why not just read general energy news?

Because generalist coverage buries the supply-chain and policy texture. A permitting decision on a transmission project, a DOE loan commitment to a lithium refinery, an NRC licensing milestone for an SMR, a FERC rulemaking on interconnection reform: these move capital in ways that earnings coverage misses. Clean Power Press is built for the people who track those signals.

Is this for traders or long-horizon investors?

Long-horizon. The thesis is a multi-decade buildout. The daily briefs work for tactical positioning, but the analytical frame is structural: supply-chain, policy, project-pipeline. If you're trading micro-moves on spot prices, this isn't your tool.

What verticals do you cover and how do they connect?

Energy storage and lithium, solar, nuclear and SMRs, grid and transmission, and critical minerals. Climate policy is the connective tissue. The verticals are separate editorial frames but they share a common insight: the bottleneck on every one of them is permitting, supply-chain concentration, and policy implementation, not the underlying technology.

What's your stance on climate change?

Climate change is established science. We don't give false balance to fossil-fuel-industry framing on the science. Our editorial stance is climate-forward: the clean energy transition is necessary, urgent, and one of the most consequential investment stories of the next several decades. That's not advocacy. We report facts, cover setbacks as well as progress, and don't oversell the pace of transition.

What's your analytical frame across verticals?

Track marginal, watch policy, ignore most price noise. The marginal capex dollar, the marginal project entering permitting, the marginal regulatory decision: these are where the structural story moves. Average inventory levels, spot price tapes, and quarterly headlines follow later and with lower signal value.

Get the brief

The weekly Clean Power Press brief.

One Sunday email, ~10 minutes to read. The week's signal-to-noise picks across energy storage, solar, nuclear, and clean power policy. What moved, what changes positioning, what's worth doing about it.

Subscribe

Join the early list

Drop your email. First issue lands when we hit a content cadence we trust.