Subscribe
Latest analysis

Coal life-extension is the second lever, and most state PUCs are quietly going along

Yesterday's piece identified four levers utilities are pulling to cover the gas turbine gap between 2027 and 2029. Lever 2, coal life-extension, has the lowest profile of the four and is also the one with the most regulatory inertia behind it. Across PJM, MISO, SPP, and the Southeast, a working list of at least 18 coal units originally scheduled for retirement between 2025 and 2029 has been deferred, re-permitted, or moved to seasonal or reliability-must-run service in the last 18 months. The state public service commissions handling these IRP amendments have largely approved them, often citing the same load-growth and reliability language utilities are submitting. The lever is unglamorous, carries real fuel, environmental, and rate-base risk, and is being pulled harder than the public reliability narrative reflects.

Read the piece →
2,600+ GW
of clean power projects in US interconnection queues
20%
of US electricity from nuclear, the largest clean baseload source
5×
projected grid storage capacity growth by 2030
$10T+
energy transition investment by 2050 (BloombergNEF)
Today

Latest news

All news →
City of Painesville, EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grants announcement us-supplyira

Painesville starts coal-to-storage build on $80M CPRG award

Construction begins this month on a 10 MW battery and 35 MW solar installation that will replace a retired municipal coal generator in northeast Ohio. The grant comes from EPA's Climate Pollution Reduction Grants program, IRA-obligated funds that continue to flow regardless of the current administration's posture. The interesting detail is the template: small municipal coal units sited on brownfields, replaced with utility-owned storage on the same parcel.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 2, 2026 ai-demanddata-centers

The hyperscaler nuclear gap: 13 GW announced, less than 20 percent of forecast demand

A June 2 Carnegie Endowment analysis puts hyperscaler nuclear commitments at up to 13 GW through the mid-2030s, generating roughly 102 TWh per year if every project lands. That is less than 20 percent of projected US data-center demand through 2035, and almost none of it delivers before 2027.

IRS Notice 2025-42; FERC Docket RM26-4-000; EIA Today in Energy (Feb 20, 2026) irapermitting

Solar's 32-day clock: the July 4 safe-harbor cliff and what gets locked in

Utility-scale solar developers have until July 4 to physically start construction or accept a December 31, 2027 placed-in-service deadline. With FERC also set to rule on large-load interconnection by month-end, the next 30 days set the policy frame for every project the EIA has already counted in its 43.4 GW 2026 forecast.

Energy-Storage.News, May 29 2026 thesis-confirmrebalance

South Australia awards 5.3 GWh of long-duration storage in first FERM tender

Six battery projects totalling 1,334 MW and 5,336 MWh won 15-year Firm Energy Reliability Mechanism Agreements in South Australia's inaugural capacity tender. The structure (long-dated contracts, 8-hour committed dispatch, competitive bid) is the cleanest working template yet for how a high-renewables grid pays for long-duration storage, and US RTOs are wrestling with the same gap.

Nextpower 8-K (NASDAQ: NXT), May 28 2026 thesis-confirmai-demand

Nextpower buys Prevalon for up to $365M, names AI data-center backlog as the prize

Nextpower (Nasdaq: NXT) signed a definitive agreement on May 28 to acquire Prevalon Energy for up to $365 million, folding in 6 GWh of deployed battery storage and 1.3 GW of firm supply contracts tied to AI and hyperscaler data centers. The deal pushes a US solar-tracker incumbent into the BESS integrator stack and prompted a fiscal 2027 revenue guide of $4.0 to $4.4 billion.

American Nuclear Society nuclearsmr

NRC's Part 57 framework targets 6-to-12-month microreactor licensing

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's proposed Part 57 rule, published in the Federal Register on May 1 with comments open through June 15, creates a risk-informed licensing pathway for reactors at or below 100 MWe. The agency projects 6 to 12 months from application to deployment and estimates $3.76 billion to $11.84 billion in combined agency and industry savings, alongside provisions for fleet approvals, manufacturing licenses, and autonomous operation.

Analysis

Recent long-form

All analysis →
Large coal-fired power station with cooling towers and stacks against a hazy sky
thesisgrid

Coal life-extension is the second lever, and most state PUCs are quietly going along

Yesterday's piece identified four levers utilities are pulling to cover the gas turbine gap between 2027 and 2029. Lever 2, coal life-extension, has the lowest profile of the four and is also the one with the most regulatory inertia behind it. Across PJM, MISO, SPP, and the Southeast, a working list of at least 18 coal units originally scheduled for retirement between 2025 and 2029 has been deferred, re-permitted, or moved to seasonal or reliability-must-run service in the last 18 months. The state public service commissions handling these IRP amendments have largely approved them, often citing the same load-growth and reliability language utilities are submitting. The lever is unglamorous, carries real fuel, environmental, and rate-base risk, and is being pulled harder than the public reliability narrative reflects.
A high-voltage transmission corridor at dusk with lines fanning out from a substation toward distant generation
thesisgrid

Bridging the gas turbine gap: the four levers utilities are pulling for 2027 to 2029

With H-class delivery slots booked into 2030 and beyond, the load growth filings IRPs assumed are getting back-solved into something else. Storage acceleration, coal life-extension, demand-side reliability programs, and behind-the-meter customer deals are the four levers carrying the gap between when capacity is needed and when new gas can show up. None of them is a clean substitute. All four are already in the filings, and they are reshaping the 2027 to 2029 reliability picture in ways that capacity auctions have not yet caught up to.
An industrial power generation facility with cooling towers and transmission infrastructure
thesisgrid

Gas turbine lead times have stretched past 60 months at the H-class tier, and the orderbook is now a binding 2029 constraint

Heavy-duty gas turbines from the three major OEMs (GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, Mitsubishi Power) are now quoting 48 to 60 month delivery windows for H-class units, with some J-class slots booked into 2031. Utility IRPs across PJM, MISO, ERCOT, and SPP have leaned on new gas capacity to backstop reliability through the data center load build, and most filings published in the last six months are not adjusting their COD assumptions for what the OEMs are actually quoting. The next chapter of the grid-buildout supply-chain story is gas, not transformers.

Frequently asked

Why not just read general energy news?

Because generalist coverage buries the supply-chain and policy texture. A permitting decision on a transmission project, a DOE loan commitment to a lithium refinery, an NRC licensing milestone for an SMR, a FERC rulemaking on interconnection reform: these move capital in ways that earnings coverage misses. Clean Power Press is built for the people who track those signals.

Is this for traders or long-horizon investors?

Long-horizon. The thesis is a multi-decade buildout. The daily briefs work for tactical positioning, but the analytical frame is structural: supply-chain, policy, project-pipeline. If you're trading micro-moves on spot prices, this isn't your tool.

What verticals do you cover and how do they connect?

Energy storage and lithium, solar, nuclear and SMRs, grid and transmission, and critical minerals. Climate policy is the connective tissue. The verticals are separate editorial frames but they share a common insight: the bottleneck on every one of them is permitting, supply-chain concentration, and policy implementation, not the underlying technology.

What's your stance on climate change?

Climate change is established science. We don't give false balance to fossil-fuel-industry framing on the science. Our editorial stance is climate-forward: the clean energy transition is necessary, urgent, and one of the most consequential investment stories of the next several decades. That's not advocacy. We report facts, cover setbacks as well as progress, and don't oversell the pace of transition.

What's your analytical frame across verticals?

Track marginal, watch policy, ignore most price noise. The marginal capex dollar, the marginal project entering permitting, the marginal regulatory decision: these are where the structural story moves. Average inventory levels, spot price tapes, and quarterly headlines follow later and with lower signal value.

Get the brief

The weekly Clean Power Press brief.

One Sunday email, ~10 minutes to read. The week's signal-to-noise picks across energy storage, solar, nuclear, and clean power policy. What moved, what changes positioning, what's worth doing about it.

Subscribe (free) Read the news
Subscribe

Join the early list

Drop your email. First issue lands when we hit a content cadence we trust.