Subscribe
Latest analysis

NRC's proposed Part 57 reshapes microreactor unit economics, not just timelines, and that is the more important story

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Part 57 proposed rule, published May 1, 2026 and open for comment through June 15, does three things at once: fleet approval of identical designs, manufacturing licenses for factory-built units, and explicit permission for autonomous remote operation. Each one separately would matter. Together they change which microreactor projects pencil, which customers can actually take delivery before 2030, and where the next binding constraint lands. The 6-to-12-month application-to-deployment number the agency is publicizing is the headline. The deeper story is that the rule moves the chokepoint off licensing and onto HALEU fuel supply, project financing, and customer offtake.

Read the piece →
2,600+ GW
of clean power projects in US interconnection queues
20%
of US electricity from nuclear, the largest clean baseload source
5×
projected grid storage capacity growth by 2030
$10T+
energy transition investment by 2050 (BloombergNEF)
Today

Latest news

All news →
American Nuclear Society nuclearsmr

NRC's Part 57 framework targets 6-to-12-month microreactor licensing

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's proposed Part 57 rule, published in the Federal Register on May 1 with comments open through June 15, creates a risk-informed licensing pathway for reactors at or below 100 MWe. The agency projects 6 to 12 months from application to deployment and estimates $3.76 billion to $11.84 billion in combined agency and industry savings, alongside provisions for fleet approvals, manufacturing licenses, and autonomous operation.

Critical Minerals News / China Rare Earth Industry Association thesis-confirmus-supply

Rare earth oxide rally lifts NdPr above the DoD price floor

Chinese NdPr oxide spot prices ran from roughly $53 per kilogram at the January 2026 open to $136 to $140 per kilogram by the end of April, a year-to-date gain of about 160 percent driven by MIIT production quotas and export licensing tightened to cover processing technology. The level matters because the Defense Department's MP Materials partnership set a $110 per kilogram price floor: at current spot the floor is out of the money, the federal subsidy stops paying, and the Western rare earth thesis is being validated by the market rather than the budget.

Energy-Storage.News / SEIA Q2 2026 ESMO thesis-confirmai-demand

SEIA logs record 9.7 GWh Q1 as data-center buyers walk past lithium

SEIA and Benchmark Mineral Intelligence report a record 9.7 GWh of US battery storage installed in Q1 2026, up 32% year over year, with 2030 deployment now projected above 610 GWh. The same report flags 467 solar and storage projects sitting in permit limbo, and the data-center demand showing up in the pipeline is increasingly chemistry-agnostic.

Reuters via CNN nuclearsmr

DOE picks Oklo and four others for surplus plutonium fuel access

The Energy Department selected Oklo, Exodys Energy, SHINE, Standard Nuclear, and Flibe Energy to enter advanced negotiations for access to roughly 20 metric tons of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. The selection reroutes a federally controlled fissile inventory toward private SMR developers, opening a parallel path to the HALEU chokepoint that has constrained advanced-reactor fuel planning.

Enbridge / Utility Dive solardata-centers

Enbridge and Meta sign $1.2B Wyoming solar + 8-hour storage for AI data centers

Enbridge will build a 365 MW solar farm paired with a 200 MW / 1,600 MWh battery system near Cheyenne to anchor Meta data center load. The 8-hour storage duration is the detail worth reading: it pushes well past the 2-to-4-hour shape that has dominated US grid-scale BESS, and signals that hyperscaler-anchored PPAs are now buying firming, not just energy.

Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council (permitting.gov), March 30 2026; USGS Appalachian lithium assessment, April 28 2026 us-supplypermitting

Kings Mountain clears federal permitting as USGS sizes Appalachian lithium at 2.3 million tonnes

The Department of Energy completed federal permitting for Albemarle's Kings Mountain lithium project in North Carolina on March 30, 2026, and a USGS assessment released April 28 estimated 2.3 million metric tonnes of undiscovered, economically recoverable lithium across the southern Appalachians and the Northeast. Together, the federal clearance and the resource estimate reframe the Carolinas as a near-term US lithium supply node, not a long-shot one. State and local approvals still gate first production, and the assessment is undiscovered resource, not reserves, so the marginal-capex dollar is what to track next.

Analysis

Recent long-form

All analysis →
Nuclear power station cooling towers at dusk (file photo)
thesisnuclear

NRC's proposed Part 57 reshapes microreactor unit economics, not just timelines, and that is the more important story

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Part 57 proposed rule, published May 1, 2026 and open for comment through June 15, does three things at once: fleet approval of identical designs, manufacturing licenses for factory-built units, and explicit permission for autonomous remote operation. Each one separately would matter. Together they change which microreactor projects pencil, which customers can actually take delivery before 2030, and where the next binding constraint lands. The 6-to-12-month application-to-deployment number the agency is publicizing is the headline. The deeper story is that the rule moves the chokepoint off licensing and onto HALEU fuel supply, project financing, and customer offtake.
High voltage transmission lines against a blue sky (file photo)
thesisferc

FERC's PJM co-location order is the most consequential grid-policy decision of 2026, and the tariff language now being drafted will set the terms for every nuclear-data-center deal in the eastern interconnection

On December 18, 2025, FERC directed PJM to draft a tariff framework for large loads co-located with generation, with PJM's terms-of-service brief due February 16, 2026 and a separate reliability informational report due January 19, 2026. The order proposes two new transmission products, Firm Contract Demand and Non-Firm Contract Demand, that a hyperscaler can take on behalf of a co-located data center in lieu of full Network Integration Transmission Service. The shape of those products, and the cost-allocation rules behind them, decides whether the next wave of nuclear-paired AI campuses gets built behind the meter, in front of the meter, or somewhere in between.
High-voltage transmission lines feeding into a utility substation (file photo)
thesisirp

Data center load is rewriting the utility IRP, and the resource plan is starting to push back against announced coal retirements

In the 2025 and early 2026 integrated resource planning cycles, the largest US investor-owned utilities have roughly doubled their forward load forecasts, with data center demand carrying the bulk of the revision. The new forecasts are flowing into the resource stack as deferred coal retirements, expanded gas peaker buildouts, and earlier retirement-replacement nuclear, not as a faster ramp on renewables. The constraint pattern is interconnection, transformer supply, and the gas turbine orderbook, in that order.

Frequently asked

Why not just read general energy news?

Because generalist coverage buries the supply-chain and policy texture. A permitting decision on a transmission project, a DOE loan commitment to a lithium refinery, an NRC licensing milestone for an SMR, a FERC rulemaking on interconnection reform: these move capital in ways that earnings coverage misses. Clean Power Press is built for the people who track those signals.

Is this for traders or long-horizon investors?

Long-horizon. The thesis is a multi-decade buildout. The daily briefs work for tactical positioning, but the analytical frame is structural: supply-chain, policy, project-pipeline. If you're trading micro-moves on spot prices, this isn't your tool.

What verticals do you cover and how do they connect?

Energy storage and lithium, solar, nuclear and SMRs, grid and transmission, and critical minerals. Climate policy is the connective tissue. The verticals are separate editorial frames but they share a common insight: the bottleneck on every one of them is permitting, supply-chain concentration, and policy implementation, not the underlying technology.

What's your stance on climate change?

Climate change is established science. We don't give false balance to fossil-fuel-industry framing on the science. Our editorial stance is climate-forward: the clean energy transition is necessary, urgent, and one of the most consequential investment stories of the next several decades. That's not advocacy. We report facts, cover setbacks as well as progress, and don't oversell the pace of transition.

What's your analytical frame across verticals?

Track marginal, watch policy, ignore most price noise. The marginal capex dollar, the marginal project entering permitting, the marginal regulatory decision: these are where the structural story moves. Average inventory levels, spot price tapes, and quarterly headlines follow later and with lower signal value.

Get the brief

The weekly Clean Power Press brief.

One Sunday email, ~10 minutes to read. The week's signal-to-noise picks across energy storage, solar, nuclear, and clean power policy. What moved, what changes positioning, what's worth doing about it.

Subscribe (free) Read the news
Subscribe

Join the early list

Drop your email. First issue lands when we hit a content cadence we trust.